| |
| |
| |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com |
| Thanks very much for downloading the printable version of this tutorial. |
| As always, we welcome any feedback or suggestions. |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com |
| Table of Contents |
| 1) Elliott Wave: Introduction |
| 2) Elliott Wave: Challenges Faced By An Expert |
| 3) Elliott Wave: The Best Of The Theory |
| 4) Elliott Wave: Shifting Into Trading Gear |
| 5) Elliott Wave: Solving The Probability Problem |
| 6) Elliott Wave: Conclusion |
| Introduction |
| There is a standard joke shared by technical analysts that if you were to put |
| twelve Elliott Wave practitioners in a room, they would fail to reach an agreement |
| on wave count and the direction in which a stock is headed. There is no doubt |
| that the |
| Elliott Wave theory |
| has posed some interpretive challenges, but is such |
| skepticism fair? |
| Robert Prechter |
| , the undisputed leading expert of Elliott Wave, has made some |
| excellent forecasts using the theory, particularly in the '70s and '80s - he |
| forecasted the horrific |
| crash of 1987 |
| . But Prechter's record at the end of |
| the twentieth century has not been stellar. In fact, his book "At The Crest Of The |
| Tidal Wave" (1995), which publicly called for the end of the great bull market in |
| 1995, was nearly five years and many |
| Dow |
| points premature; he was advising |
| clients to exit the market even though the ascent was nowhere near its end. |
| If even the leading Elliott Wave expert finds Elliott Wave theory and its |
| application so challenging, what hope is there for the rest of us? The high degree |
| of subjectivity involved in using the theory is one reason why it can be so |
| problematic and why it is rare to find agreement among practitioners. This leads |
| to uncertainty, which in trading or investing leads to inaction. This may explain |
| (Page 1 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| why so many traders opt to trade without Elliott Wave or give up in frustration |
| after using it for a while. But is such an attitude akin to throwing the baby out with |
| the bath water? |
| In this feature, we hunt down and use Elliott Wave-based programs and products |
| that greatly streamline the process of taking the theory and applying it to trade. |
| Think of these as applications that help bring Elliott Wave into the twenty-first |
| century. |
| Our goal is to familiarize readers with the new millennium version of Elliott Wave |
| theory. For those who may have rejected the theory out of frustration, this tutorial |
| will demonstrate how new developments in technology have transformed this |
| application, which was developed more than sixty years ago. |
| First, let's take a look at the history of Prechter's application of Elliott Wave and |
| how it demonstrates both the successes and challenges of the theory. |
| Challenges Faced By An Expert |
| In late September and early October 1987, |
| Robert Prechter |
| saw three conditions |
| that had not occurred since the top of 1976. To begin with, the price pattern of |
| the wave structure in the U.S. stock market |
| rally |
| between Sept 20 and Oct 2 of |
| 1987 took the shape of a rebound in a larger decline, rather than the start of a |
| new wave. It was typical of a |
| bear market |
| rally. |
| Secondly, he observed a distinct reduction in upside momentum, and the trading |
| index quickly became extremely |
| overbought |
| , which indicated that the rally was in |
| trouble. |
| Advance/decline |
| ratios were the worst of the year, suggesting that |
| market internals were in failure mode. |
| Finally, Prechter noticed that investor psychology was shifting strongly and that |
| premiums on stock |
| index futures |
| had soared to their highest levels in 18 months. |
| In other words, traders and investors were more bullish than they had been in the |
| previous year and a half. With most of the market players in long positions, who |
| was left to buy? |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 2 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Figure 1 – Daily Dow Jones Industrial Average 1987 showing date (Oct 2, 1987) |
| when Prechter advised clients to exit the market. |
| It was enough to cause Prechter to advise his subscribers to get out on Friday, |
| Oct 2, 1987 (according to the article "Black Monday Postscript," published in |
| S&C |
| Volume 5 Issue 11) (see Figure 1). The Dow Jones Industrial Average |
| closed at 2640.99. The following Monday - and the ensuing two and a half weeks |
| - saw the mighty index drop to 1738.74 in an astounding decline of more than |
| 34%. Oct 19 became known as |
| Black Monday |
| and set the record for the largest |
| one-day percentage drop - a startling 23%. Clients who took Prechter's advice to |
| get out missed the sickening ride down and no doubt felt deeply indebted to him. |
| Robert Prechter has been studying Elliott Wave theory since the 1970s. He used |
| it while working as a technical market specialist at Merrill Lynch. In 1978 he co- |
| authored "Elliott Wave Principle" with A.J. Frost. He also launched |
| The Elliott |
| Wave Theorist |
| , a newsletter devoted to the analysis of U.S. markets. In the |
| 1980s, Prechter became a household name in the financial community, and he |
| won numerous awards for |
| market timing |
| , as well as the U.S. Trading |
| Championship. The Financial News Network (now CNBC) dubbed him the "guru |
| of the decade" in the 1980s. He is the CEO and founder of Elliott Wave |
| International and has authored numerous books about Elliott Wave, including "At |
| The Crest Of The Tidal Wave" (1995) |
| , |
| "View From The Top Of The Grand |
| Supercycle" (2003) |
| , |
| "Conquer The Crash: You Can Survive And Prosper In A |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 3 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Deflationary Depression" (2002) |
| , |
| "Socionomics: The Science Of History And |
| Social Prediction" (2003) |
| , |
| "Market Analysis For The New Millennium" (2002) and |
| "Beautiful Pictures From The Gallery Of Phinance" (2003). |
| Discerning Patterns |
| Trader Garrett Jones, a 30-plus-year veteran in the money management |
| industry, initially met Prechter in the early 1980s when both were occasional |
| speakers on the same financial speaking circuit. Jones had been aware of |
| market waves for years and had read the work of numerous technical analysts |
| discussing price patterns. Jones noticed that things seem to happen in threes. |
| The market would frequently make three advances and then have a correction. |
| He also noticed that three advances would generally have a definable pattern. |
| The first pattern Jones observed was a series of three waves (each of which was |
| interrupted by a |
| retracement |
| or corrective wave) in which the first wave was |
| longest. In the second pattern, wave 2 was longest, and in the third, the last |
| wave was longest. It is important to note that the middle wave is never the |
| shortest wave in any viable pattern. What Jones realized in listening to Prechter |
| was that the price patterns he had observed on occasion were actually the basic |
| impulse waves discussed in Elliott Wave theory. |
| Jones credits Prechter with helping him better understand the intricate details of |
| Elliott Wave theory and thus become a better trader. However, Jones still thinks |
| the theory is most valuable for looking at the |
| macroeconomic |
| picture. |
| The Elliott Challenge |
| Prechter has had other notable successes in forecasting |
| Dow Industrial |
| moves |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 4 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| well before they occurred. In the Sept 1982 issue of |
| The Elliott Wave Theorist, |
| published one month after the end of a 16-year |
| sideways |
| trend, he correctly |
| forecasted the great "lift-off" that year. It was the start of what many have called |
| the big |
| bull market |
| , although Prechter believes this bull market really began at |
| the Dow multi-year low in Dec 1974. |
| But in his earlier book, "Elliott Wave Principle", co-authored with A.J. Frost in |
| 1978, the two underestimated the top of the next wave five 'supercycle,' |
| projecting a final target top at 2860. Those reading Prechter's |
| Elliott Wave |
| Theorist |
| newsletter in 1982 were advised that the target had been revised to |
| 3873-3885 and would be reached by 1987 or 1990. While in retrospect these |
| forecasts fell far short of the ultimate gain, they were the highest published |
| predictions of their day during a time when most people doubted the market's |
| prospects. |
| When the '90s rolled around, Prechter was just as radical in the other direction, |
| once again opposing the general consensus. But as we mentioned earlier, his |
| book "At The Crest Of The Tidal Wave", which publicly called for the end of the |
| great bull market in 1995, was nearly five years and many Dow points premature. |
| Prechter subsequently wrote a chapter detailing why he missed a big portion of |
| the bull market. |
| Garrett Jones is quick to come to Prechter's defense: |
| "It doesn't matter if you use EWT or other methods of technical analysis, it is |
| important to be disciplined and admit when you are wrong. No one is right 100% |
| of the time and Prechter has been quick to adjust his forecasts as new |
| information comes in. He is a brilliant analyst, and he remains bearish to this day |
| for reasons to do with his understanding of Elliott Wave and overriding market |
| and economic fundamentals. He may not be sure exactly when the market will |
| crash, but he knows it's coming." |
| As Prechter points out, the Dow nearly quintupled from 1974 to 1987. Who would |
| have believed it would more than quintuple again by 2000? Such a move was |
| unprecedented. |
| Plug and Play Elliott Wave Theory - Can it be Done? |
| Ralph Nelson Elliott's |
| original work, "The Wave Principle", was published in 1938 |
| long before the days of the computer. The fact that he progressed as far as he |
| did with his observations and calculations without the use of a computer is an |
| amazing feat in itself. Given the highly technical and analytical nature of |
| developing Elliott Wave-based forecasts, would it not make sense to have |
| computers do the difficult and tedious background work, thus freeing the trader to |
| take the results and use them with far greater ease? Many traders think so, and |
| while Prechter maintains the conviction that it will always take a certain amount |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 5 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| of human intervention to finalize an Elliott Wave forecast, his company is |
| currently working on a computer application that will greatly streamline the |
| process for clients. They are not alone. |
| In our next installment of this series, we'll examine an approach that takes |
| specific parts of Elliott's principle and uses it for short-term |
| intraday |
| trading and |
| longer-term end-of-day trades to greatly simplify trading decisions. It is a great |
| way to discuss Elliott Wave theory and how it works in real-time trades. |
| The Best Of The Theory |
| For those not familiar with |
| Elliott Wave theory |
| its most basic tenet is that market |
| movements are based on crowd behavior, which is seen as predictable given |
| similar situations. Creator R.N. Elliott showed that these movements occur in a |
| series of impulse and corrective waves. |
| For example, a bearish impulse swing consists of three waves down and two |
| waves up (see Figure 1). Major |
| impulse waves |
| down (1, 3 and 5) can be further |
| broken down into smaller five-part impulse down waves and corrective up waves, |
| depending on the time frame over which the waves are observed. Bullish waves |
| move in the opposite direction. |
| But this is where it starts to get more complicated. These smaller waves can be |
| further broken down into more waves, which are interrelated by |
| Fibonacci |
| numbers |
| (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, etc.), and on it goes. Wave analysis runs the |
| gamut from supercycles lasting hundreds of years to sub-minuets that may last |
| only a few minutes on an |
| intraday |
| chart. |
| One of the hardest things about trading Elliott Wave is its degree of complexity. |
| To make it even more challenging, there are alternates to every potential move, |
| which basically tells the trader that if this move doesn't go up, it will go down, but |
| he or she will know that only after the fact! The rule of alternation also means that |
| the corrective waves 2 and 4 will alternate. If a wave 2 down is a simple wave, |
| then wave 4 will probably be complex, but not necessarily. Then there are X |
| waves. These are waves that connect complex corrections. |
| It is easy to see why many novices shy away from using Elliott Wave and why |
| many traders who have invested thousands of hours into it (and lost dollars trying |
| to develop working trading strategies) finally abandon it altogether. |
| Starting with the End in Mind |
| To begin with, the trader must have realistic expectations. Most new traders |
| spend the majority of their time looking for a system that has an unrealistically |
| high win/loss ratio. Those still seeking a system that consistently produces more |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 6 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| than 50% winners in the long term haven't learned that surviving the market |
| means knowing how to deal with losses. Suc h traders are looking for the Holy |
| Grail, and it doesn't exist. |
| It's worth remembering what well-known author and professional trader Perry |
| Kaufman had to say after years of exhaustive testing of various trend-following |
| systems, some of which were discussed in his book "Trading Systems And |
| Methods" (1998): "You can expect six or seven out of 10 trend trades to be |
| losses, some small some a little larger." |
| And yet, Kaufman says that trend-following systems are some of the best trading |
| systems around. In other words, trend-following systems have more losers than |
| winners, but professional traders who use them make money consistently. |
| Renowned technical analyst John Murphy echoes this sentiment when he states |
| that veteran professional traders experience winning trades 40% of the time. |
| Granted, it is possible to outperform this record over short-term periods, but |
| expecting any system to do much better over the long haul is unrealistic. |
| This means that for any system to be profitable long-term, money management is |
| key. If a trading system cannot be profitable with more losses than winners, find |
| another system or spend more time on money management. In short, losses |
| must be kept small and profits must be allowed to accumulate. Unfortunately, the |
| majority of traders do just the opposite and end up going out of business. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 7 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Figure 1 – Chart of Dow Industrial Average ($INDU) five-minute intraday chart |
| showing a short-term bear Elliott five-wave impulse pattern. On a one-minute |
| chart, a further breakdown of smaller impulse and corrective waves could be |
| observed. The colored bands are key areas of support, which are potential areas |
| of reversal. |
| Applying this idea to trading Elliott, Figure 1 shows a five-minute chart of the Dow |
| Industrial e-mini futures with a five-part impulse wave. Colored bands show the |
| points of |
| support |
| (or |
| resistance |
| in an uptrend) and are where the trader looks to |
| place a trade or adjust stops on current positions. |
| Programming Elliott to Trade |
| In the 500+ page manual for MTPredicto |
| r |
| , author and creator of the program |
| Steve Griffiths |
| makes an interesting observation. He says there are basically |
| three types of people when it comes to Elliott Wave. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 8 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| 1) Those who are new to the principle and still completely amazed at what it |
| promises. |
| 2) Those who are experienced but frustrated by their lack of |
| success/consistency. |
| 3) Those who have completely given up (sometimes after years of trying to make |
| it work) and are frustrated by the whole experience. |
| To avoid falling into the third category, the modern trader needs to ask how Elliott |
| Wave theory can be used to make money in today's markets. Is there a way of |
| automating the analytical process using the complete theory, or is it possible to |
| strip it down and isolate specific aspects of the principle to pick money-making |
| trades? Becoming an expert but finding it impossible to make money is a waste |
| of time. |
| As an Elliot Wave expert and a private trader with more than 17 years of |
| experience, Griffiths asked himself the same questions. After spending years |
| trying to make money on a consistent basis using alternate methods, he went |
| back to Elliott Wave basics. He started with the premise that if Elliott Wave was |
| to work in a program, he had to find setups that limited risk to a minimum that |
| allowed profits to run. These setups had to be specific, identifiable and |
| consistently profitable. If overall losses are greater than profits, what good are |
| the longer-term forecasts for which Elliott Wave analysis is famous? |
| According to the theory, the strongest moves in a trend, whether up or down, are |
| the impulse waves 1, 3 and 5. Of the three impulsive waves, the largest and most |
| profitable is generally wave 3. Therefore, the ideal place to enter a trade is at the |
| beginning of wave 3, which is the end of a corrective wave 2. Could the program |
| be designed to hone in on these ABC corrective patterns (see Figure 2) that |
| normally unfold in a wave 2 and provide the trader with a high-probability point of |
| entry? Here is what Griffiths said in an Oct 2004 interview to discuss how the |
| program came into being: |
| "In computer testing, we found that it was possible to enter with a minimum risk |
| after an ABC had recently unfolded and the best were those that made up wave |
| 2. By entering long trades very near significant support levels (and short traders |
| near significant resistance levels), losses would be kept small if the trade turned |
| out to be a loser. Winners had the potential to be very profitable indeed when the |
| trader caught a wave 3 but the system had to be designed in such a way that the |
| large gains were a bonus, not essential to the profitability of the system." |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 9 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Figure 2 – End-of-day chart of iShares Japan on quick breakout from an ABC |
| corrective pattern buy signal. |
| This became Griffiths' goal: to design a computer program for his personal use |
| that could search for ABC patterns that made up a wave 2 ending at or near |
| significant support or resistance areas with a minimum risk/reward of 2:1. He |
| could then choose only those that met specific risk/reward ratios according to his |
| written trading plan. A more aggressive approach would be to take every trade |
| generated by the program. A more conservative style allowed him to choose |
| trades with a minimum risk/reward of 2.5 or 3:1. |
| After the first version of the program was completed four years ago, Griffiths |
| realized that the application he had developed had commercial potential since |
| there had to be others like him who were frustrated with the lack of success using |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 10 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Elliott but knew that it was based on sound technical and crowd behavior |
| principles. |
| Figure 3 – An intraday trade on the Dow e-minis futures (YM) showing a very |
| profitable trade. |
| Figure 3 shows the program in action. It is a chart of the five-minute Dow (YM) e- |
| mini futures trade with the proprietary colored bands of significant |
| support/resistance. These are generated with the use of automatic Fibonacci |
| price clusters of varying degree and from multiple |
| pivots |
| that tell the trader where |
| the highest probability of pauses and reversals should occur. As you can see, the |
| trade was very profitable having moved well past the ‘two to three times' profit |
| area (blue band) to end the day at a new multi-period low resulting in a profit of |
| approximately 12 times the initial risk (ignoring |
| slippage |
| and commission) at the |
| lower projected profit target. While this is not a typical trade, it demonstrates what |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 11 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| can happen when the trader catches a strong wave-3 move. |
| For the sake of those unfamiliar with the program, MTPredicto |
| r |
| includes a |
| record |
| of all trades the program has called (with a minimum risk/reward ratio of 2:1) |
| since July 26, 2004. Since real money was not used and commissions and |
| slippage not included, the trade results are hypothetical. It is not unusual to see |
| more losses than wins, but what is important is the comparison of the number of |
| points or dollars that were won to those that were lost. This is the acid test of |
| whether a money management system is working. |
| For those who are interested, a software review of the program, " |
| Software |
| Review: MTPredictor Real-Time 4.0 |
| ", was published in the Sept 2004 issue |
| of |
| The Technical Analyst. |
| The Key to Success |
| Here is what fund trader John McClure of |
| Equitrend |
| said when asked about |
| profitability in an Oct 2004 interview: |
| "Profitability cannot be discussed without mentioning the other side of the |
| equation: risk. The trap that many investors and traders fall into is to focus on the |
| first part of the equation while not paying attention to the second. The |
| professional money manager's goal is to improve profits by managing risk. Risk |
| should be the most important part of the equation, not the other way around." |
| In other words, find a system that manages risk first and the profits will usually |
| take care of themselves. |
| To borrow an old saying, there are many ways "to skin a cat" when trading. No |
| single trading system will attract or work for everyone. This is especially true for |
| Elliott Wave. |
| Finding specific parts of Elliott theory and transforming them into a workable |
| trading system in which risk can be carefully controlled is one way to use the |
| theory. And MTPredicto |
| r |
| shows that you don't have to use the complete Elliott |
| Wave theory to trade successfully. By taking small parts of the theory, using a |
| computer and the right program, traders can now learn to trade Elliott without |
| having to become experts in the theory itself. This is a good example of how one |
| company has taken Elliott's brainchild and adapted it to work in the twenty-first |
| century. |
| Shifting Into Trading Gear |
| In the preceding section in this series, we look at how one company isolated |
| parts of Elliott Wave patterns and helped the trader identify them in both end-of- |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 12 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| day and real-time trading situations. In this section, we talk to an experienced |
| trade systems designer who has researched the challenge of implementing Elliott |
| Wave theory by computer since the mid-1990s. |
| The Designer |
| Murray Ruggiero |
| is no stranger to trading system users. He is the author of a |
| number of books on the topic - including "Cybernetic Trading Strategies: |
| Developing A Profitable Trading Strategy With State-Of-The-Art Technologies" |
| (1997) and "Traders' Secrets Psychological & Technical Analysis: Real People |
| Becoming Successful Traders" (1999), the |
| Inside Advantage |
| newsletter, as well |
| as more than 70 articles in various trading public ations. His work is referenced in |
| books by such prominent authors as Larry Williams, John Murphy and Perry |
| Kaufman. |
| In his book "Trading Systems And Methods" (1998), trading system specialist |
| Perry Kaufman presents four of Ruggiero's suggestions for trading Elliott by |
| machine: |
| 1) Enter wave 3 in the direction of the trend. |
| 2) Stay out of market during wave 4. |
| 3) Enter wave 5. |
| 4) Take countertrend ABC at top of wave 5. |
| Kaufman also says: "When a wave appears in two time frames such as both daily |
| and weekly charts, the likelihood of the success of this formation increases." |
| Without some sort of confirmation, the risk of being on the wrong side of the |
| trade increases. |
| Accuracy is Not Key? |
| The problem with trading Elliott concepts by computer, Ruggiero believ es, is that |
| the designer must reduce the highly subjective aspect of the theory into |
| quantifiable, specific components. The goal is to find those areas of the theory |
| that work best and then tell the computer how to find them for you. |
| To Ruggiero, the key is not in trying to "teach" the machine to count Elliott Waves |
| accurately because, like Robert Prechter, Ruggiero still believes that it takes a |
| degree of human intervention to apply the highly complex aspects of Elliott Wave |
| interpretation. This need for human involvement is due to the fact that Elliott |
| Wave has been traditionally used in longer-term forecasting. |
| But traders are more interested in much shorter time frames, and it makes sense |
| that a system that is to trade intraday has a different focus than a system looking |
| for a target that is weeks, months or years away. |
| "There is a difference between today's count and the true count," Ruggiero says. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 13 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| "The key to trading Elliott lies in not getting hung up on the correct wave count, |
| but rather in determining the count that has the least penalty for being wrong." |
| Finding the correct count requires time. There are nine different wave patterns or |
| degrees of trend in Elliott Wave ranging from the grand supercycle lasting |
| hundreds of years to the sub-minuet degree covering a few hours. Elliott |
| practitioners can spend days arguing over correct wave count but, in many |
| cases, the number will not be confirmed until after the fact. |
| However, the trader is not interested in whether the chosen |
| index |
| or |
| future |
| is the |
| first or third wave but rather what his or her risk of being wrong is versus the |
| potential reward. A trader is really looking for an entry price that is close to |
| support, which, if broken, will nullify the pattern and result in a small loss but, if |
| correct, will return three to five times the amount risked. |
| For example, if, in the complete Elliott Wave below, the trader mistook the bottom |
| of wave 2 to be the bottom of wave 4 and entered a long trade, he or she would |
| catch wave 3 instead of wave 5 and still make a good profit because both waves |
| 3 and 5 are generally powerful up moves. In certain cases, a wave 3 is the |
| longest wave in the pattern. |
| Now let's say the same trader mistook wave B for wave 1, and then entered a |
| long trade at the next pause bec ause he or she thought it was a new wave 3; this |
| pause would've actually been a continuation of wave C, making the trade a |
| painful experience, especially if wave C was incomplete. |
| In Figure 1 below, we see an example of a wave pattern that was identified by |
| the computer as an ABC wave but was actually part of a much larger corrective |
| wave. It worked out well for the trader, who, instead of earning the expected |
| profit of two- to three-times risk (5.5 points), made more than six times that |
| amount. |
| The point is that it doesn't really matter if the trader gets the wave count wrong. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 14 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| As long as he or she determines the primary direction of the trend, properly |
| differentiates between the primary and corrective waves and uses tight stops and |
| realistic profit targets, trades can still be very profitable. |
| Figure 1 – Five-minute chart of the Dow Industrial Average showing a profitable |
| trade and the Elliott Wave Oscillator in the lower window. |
| Elliott Wave Oscillator |
| What can an Elliott Wave computer trader use to gain greater insight into where |
| he or she is in a wave? Create an Elliott Wave |
| oscillator |
| (EWO), according to |
| Perry Kaufman. The EWO is simply the difference between a five-period and 35- |
| period |
| simple moving average |
| , which in Figure 1 is shown as red and blue |
| moving average lines. |
| In |
| Metastock |
| , for example, the formula for the EWO is simple. To get the display |
| shown in Figure 1, plot the formula below as a histogram: |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 15 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| EWO = Mov(Close, 5) – Mov(Close, 35). |
| Note the magenta lines in the main chart and those in the lower EWO window |
| slanting in the opposite direction. This shows clear divergence between price and |
| the Elliott Wave oscillator - a sign that a change in direction is imminent. |
| Kaufman says that a new upward trend is identified when the EWO makes a |
| higher high than the previous EWO high. For example, in an uptrend, a wave-3 |
| EWO high would be greater than a wave-1 high. |
| As we see in figure 1, the EWO, like any good oscillator, can also be used as a |
| warning of |
| divergence |
| and the change in direction. After watching the EWO for a |
| while, you will begin to see the pattern. In an uptrend, the EWO will put in a |
| series of higher highs after which it will drop below zero, which will be the ABC |
| corrective pattern. A new series is then about to begin. |
| Trades confirmed by an oscillator are lower risk than those without confirmation. |
| When the oscillator begins to put in a series of lower highs while price puts in |
| higher highs, get ready for a trend change. |
| In Summary |
| Rather than try to "train" the computer to perform the complex and subjective |
| task of accurately identifying all aspects of the Elliott Wave, it is far more feasible |
| to isolate patterns that are close to each other and places where the penalty for |
| being wrong is minimized. |
| This means identifying the primary trend, taking trades in this direction and |
| setting tight stops in case you have made an error in your analysis. It won't |
| matter that much if you mistakenly identify one part of the wave for another as |
| long as they are similar parts in the wave cycle. |
| To help confirm the proper entry and exit points, the Elliott Wave oscillator can be |
| used to choose higher highs and higher lows in an uptrend, or lower highs and |
| lower lows in a downtrend. Divergence between the oscillator and price is also a |
| very useful tool for trade confirmation. Furthermore, wherever possible, |
| confirmation in different time periods - for example, a five- and 15-minute chart |
| for short-term traders, or a daily and weekly chart for longer-term traders - further |
| increases the chances of a profitable outcome. |
| With a basic understanding of the theory and a bit of practice, it won't be long |
| before you are using what you have learned to enhance your trading acumen. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 16 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Solving the Probability Problem |
| "Pride of opinion has been responsible |
| for the downfall of more men on Wall |
| Street than any other factor." |
| Charles Dow |
| Without a doubt, the greatest drawback of using Elliott Wave theory (EWT), and |
| the reason most traders avoid it, is its high degree of subjectivity. Even the most |
| experienced Elliott experts can have trouble agreeing on wave counts and |
| forecasts on the same issue, index or |
| commodity |
| . Where there is subjectivity, |
| there is uncertainty. Overcoming this uncertainty requires the guidance of solid |
| probabilities determined by statistical analysis. Let's take a look at a development |
| that, through computer power, has helped take the subjectivity out of the Elliott |
| Wave theory. |
| Adverse Effects of Opinions |
| As all successful traders have learned, solid rules are essential to long-term |
| success. The possible variations in deriving an Elliott Wave count while either |
| strictly or strongly adhering to the original rules make it hard to know which count |
| is best. Ultimately, the analyst chooses the count with which he or she feels most |
| comfortable, but that is often based on little more than an educated guess or past |
| experience. As such, the analysts may be prone to get "married" to the opinion, |
| even when logic might dictate otherwise. |
| Opinions never hurt when it comes to the markets until there is money at stake. If |
| the market goes against the trader, unquestioning loyalty to an opinion can be |
| very costly. Fear of being wrong, combined with pride of opinion, is a deadly |
| handicap in the trading business; emotional gremlins are more responsible for |
| traders' failings than any other single factor. |
| In his book, |
| " |
| Trading In The Zone" (2000), trader Mark Douglas helps traders |
| break the emotional habit. All great traders who have sustained success have |
| learned to think in probabilities, realizing that trading is nothing more than a |
| numbers game. Successful traders have made it a habit to make decisions only if |
| they know the |
| risk/reward ratio |
| and if they have |
| backtested |
| and recorded the |
| past success of their system. Emotions don't control these decisions. |
| Probabilities do. |
| Until the late twentieth century, however, Elliott traders did not have the luxury of |
| knowing the precise probabilities of success or failure of a forecast. Because of |
| the complexities of Elliott Wave, there was no way of knowing what to expect |
| with any degree of mathematical confidence from even a single Elliott Wave |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 17 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| pattern, let alone a complicated one spanning a number of years. No public |
| databases providing that information were available. |
| Putting Elliott to the Test |
| In 1994, a small team from Perth led by Rich Swannell began designing Elliott |
| Wave computer programs for traders. Swannell was a programmer first and |
| trader second. Very few in the world of trading are good at both. |
| During the early years, the team consulted with Elliott veterans, conducted |
| intense research, and developed what Swannell claims was the world's first |
| comprehensive software program designed to analyze price data using the rules |
| and guidelines of Elliott's theory. The problem with the software was that it was |
| based on observations and not an exhaustive statistical analysis of wave |
| reliability. And, while results from the software were respectable, without |
| probabilities the trader was still trading blind. How could a way be found to |
| overcome this weakness? |
| The team came up with a novel solution. Swannell developed a screen saver in |
| 2001 that would work in the background on the computers of more than three |
| thousand volunteers. While not being used by their owners, these machines |
| would be scanning a universe of stocks, commodities and indexes to search for |
| and analyze Elliott Wave patterns. The goal was to determine once and for all |
| which patterns worked, which did not and even whether the Elliott Wave theory |
| itself had sufficient merit to trade it with confidence. It was all based on |
| mathematical probabilities. |
| After eighteen months and hundreds of thousands of hours of computer time, the |
| team had enough data to start analyzing it. For those interested in more details, |
| Swannell wrote a book about the experience, "Elite Trader's Secrets: Market |
| Forecasting With The New Elliot Wave System" (2003); it includes a good |
| analysis of Elliott patterns. Here is a summary of what they found: |
| 1. Not only did the Elliott Wave theory prove to be statistically sound, the |
| research was able to generate the probabilities of a forecast being correct. |
| In other words, the trader could now know the chances of a wave pattern |
| and the resulting forecast with a low margin of error (statistical |
| significance). |
| 2. The most common Elliott Wave patterns were often significantly different |
| in both shape and frequency than the previous conceptions of them. Some |
| patterns that were previously believed to be reliable did not work often |
| enough to be used with any degree of confidence. |
| 3. The team confirmed Murray Ruggiero's finding that a correct wave count is |
| not the most important factor in trading. Even with the help of a good |
| program, all Elliott forecasts are, at best, an educated guess: a trader can |
| never be certain because there is always a larger pattern that cannot be |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 18 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| included in the analysis unless he or she goes back to the beginning of |
| time. Swannell's team found that since many alternate counts result in |
| similar forecasts, this problem of possible inaccuracy is not as critical as |
| many previously thought. As long as a count is arrived at logically, |
| adheres to the rules and is confirmed over various time periods, it doesn't |
| matter what the larger degree (next largest wave pattern) is. In Swannell's |
| findings, the most probable scenarios gave exactly or at least very similar |
| forecasted results. This finding is crucial to a trader's success and means |
| that, as Ruggiero says, the count is of less importance than the penalty for |
| being wrong, which is the loss on the trade. |
| 4. By performing forecasts in various time frames, the team separated the |
| issues that worked from those that didn't. Forecasts for those that |
| exhibited no consensus over various time periods wer e deemed unreliable |
| (see our example below for a more detailed explanation). The probability |
| for failure in most cases was greater than the probability for success, so |
| why take the chance? |
| Of the thousands of equities, indexes and commodities tested, Swannell's team |
| found that in about 65% of the cases, Elliott Wave theory proved too unreliable to |
| be used to trade with any degree of confidence. In other words, using the theory |
| to trade the instruments included in this 65% would prove a losing proposition. It |
| means that traders should limit their focus to the 35% that proved to be viable |
| trading candidates. |
| But why did only about one-third of the candidates work using Elliott? It has to do |
| with the basis of the Elliott principle, which quantifies market crowd behavior. |
| Elliott Wave theory works best in equities that (1) have lots of volume ( |
| liquidity |
| ) |
| and (2) move according to key forces of fear and greed on the part of many |
| participants. When a security is not prone to this crowd behavior and is controlled |
| instead by a few strong hands, Elliott patterns begin to break down. Issues |
| traded by a few are more subject to manipulation and control and, therefore, are |
| more difficult to forecast. |
| Elliott warned us that his theory worked best on indexes and very liquid |
| securities, so Swannell's finding was not all that surprising. But now the notion |
| was proven and quantified and a list of trading candidates was identified. In the |
| process, a large amount of subjectivity and uncertainty was removed. All this |
| information was now stored and available in a large database for immediate |
| computer reference. |
| Coding and Applying the Lessons Learned |
| Through ongoing research and data from the screen saver program, Swannell's |
| team further discovered that certain techniques, when consistently applied, |
| generated impressive forecasting results. A new proprietary indicator based in |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 19 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| part on the Elliott Wave oscillator also greatly assisted the trader in recognizing |
| and confirming key reversal points. |
| The new discoveries were in part based on a prime tenet of |
| technical analysis |
| that if a pattern or method of analysis works in one time frame, it should also |
| work in others. Moreover, the more time frames in which patterns confirm each |
| other, the higher the probability that a forecast will be correct. For example, if a |
| pattern within daily data agrees with one found in weekly data, the trader can |
| have greater confidence in the pattern. |
| Swannell's team also found that a pattern confirmed in the same time period (that |
| is, one day) over multiple date ranges was much more reliable. For example, |
| using a starting point of the Oct 1987 low, let's say that we find an impulse wave |
| consisting of three up-waves and two down- (corrective) waves in an uptrend. If |
| this impulse wave agrees with patterns we find using a low from 1998, a low from |
| 2002 and one from 2003, the reliability of a forecast made using these four time |
| periods is substantially higher than one made in only one or two time frames. |
| This confirmation of patterns has become the basic premise of forecasting using |
| the program called the Refined Elliott Trader. |
| Taking the process one step further, the software Swannell's team developed |
| rated each pattern, and those exhibiting a rating of 80 or more were reliable |
| enough to use in a forecast. Those with scores above 100 were most reliable. |
| Let's look at an example analyzing the |
| S&P 500 Index |
| using end-of-day data. |
| The following charts show how the program is used to produce market forecasts. |
| In this example, head trader Mark Lindsay takes us through the analysis process |
| of locating confirmation Elliott Waves over four different time periods. We are |
| looking for parts of the same wave patterns. The more closely they confirm each |
| other, the more confidence we can have in the forecast. . |
| The Refined Elliott Trader looks for statistically significant matches and rates |
| each pattern it identifies. Note on the left-hand side of each chart the list of |
| numbers showing the rating of each pattern. We are looking for ratings (at the top |
| of the list) of 80 or better. A rating of 100 is excellent and means that the pattern |
| on the screen shows a strong correlation with similar patterns found in the |
| database. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 20 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Figure 1 – Long-term chart of the SPX from 1990 to 2004 showing large impulse |
| wave and forecasted price using RET. |
| In Figure 1 we start with a chart going back 15 years from 2004. It shows the |
| longest-term chart with an impulse wave starting in late 1990. Wave 1 peaks in |
| mid-2000, and wave 2 bottoms in Oct 2002. Wave 2 is a corrective ABC pattern. |
| According to this chart in 2003-2004 and going into 2005, we were in a wave 3. |
| The dark red rectangular pattern, which has a target area between 2000 and |
| 3500 (indicated by dark-red vertical line) is the longer-term forecast. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 21 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Figure 2 – Second shorter-term chart of SPX focusing in on the same impuls e |
| pattern shown in figure 1. |
| Next we isolate the wave 2 from Mar 2000 to Oct 2002 (figure 2) to see the |
| pattern in more detail. Remember, we are looking for pattern confirmation in each |
| step of the process. As we take a closer look at each pattern, we see each wave |
| in greater detail. |
| In Figure 2, we take a closer look at the period from late 2000 to late 2003 and |
| isolate impulse wave 3. Impulse waves occur in waves of five while corrective |
| waves like the one we see if figure 1 between 2000 and 2002 occur in waves of |
| three. Also note that forecasts generated in each chart confirm one another. This |
| is important if the trader is to have a high degree of confidence in the ultimate |
| forecast. |
| In figure 3, we focus in closer, looking at the period from Feb 2003 and Dec 2004 |
| showing impulse wave 3 in greater detail. It shows the first part of wave 3 |
| followed by a ‘double 3' (sideways corrective wave) with the start of a smaller |
| wave 3 (at the buy arrow). |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 22 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Figure 3 – Third shorter-term chart of SPX gives a closer look at the impulse |
| pattern showing a similar forecast to the above charts. |
| The final screen (Figure 4) shows the latest wave 3 from Aug 2004 to Dec 2004. |
| The smaller parts of this wave consist of even smaller impulse waves 1, 2, 3, 4, |
| and what looks to be the start of an impulsive wave 5 with an immediate price |
| target from Dec 3 between 1220 and 1290. |
| This program also produces expected time ranges for each target (not shown in |
| these figures). |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 23 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
![]() |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| Figure 4 – Smallest time frame chart of the SPX showing end of impulse wave, |
| forecasted price and the proprietary Refined Elliott Oscillator (lower window) |
| used to help traders pick potential entry and exit points. |
| It is important that the waves found by the program in each of the four charts |
| confirm one other. If the overall pattern in the first chart is not found in the |
| following three charts in a lesser degree, something is wrong and it's time to go |
| back to the drawing board. If after performing a detailed search, the patterns |
| don't agree, it's better to discard the prospect of trading the security than risk a |
| bad trade. |
| Challenges and Solutions |
| The program developed by the Australian team may have solved a number of the |
| challenges that existed, but it is not for those looking for an effortless trading |
| system. |
| As a word of warning, the Refined Elliott Trader demands a thorough |
| understanding and recognition of Elliott Wave patterns. A minimum of 50 hours is |
| required to learn the 60 modules in the first level Elliottician course and then pass |
| the four wave-recognition speed tests. Those with a phobia for learning or with |
| little interest in probing the nuances of Elliott Wave theory are advised to look |
| elsewhere. |
| But in the final analysis, all Elliott traders should take heart in the findings of this |
| research even if they have no interest in using a computer program. It proves |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 24 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| mathematically that the theory developed more than seventy years ago by R.N. |
| Elliott is based on sound principles of market behavior. Actions taken by |
| investors in the past do have chart pattern ramifications in the present, |
| regardless of the reasons for these actions. The scope and duration of these |
| reactions can be used to trade or invest longer term with greater confidence. |
| Conclusion |
| Here are some principles about Elliott Wave we discovered in this tutorial: |
| The |
| Elliott Wave theory |
| requires a high degree of subjectivity, which is one |
| • |
| reason why using the theory can be so problematic - finding agreement |
| among Elliott Wave practitioners can be rare. |
| The most basic tenet of Elliott Wave theory is that market movements are |
| • |
| based on crowd behavior, which can be predicted. Traders, however, may |
| often discern a market move only after it has occurred. |
| Robert Prechter |
| , leading expert of Elliott Wave, has made some accurate |
| • |
| forecasts using the theory, particularly in the '70s and '80s. Specifically, he |
| forecasted the crash of 1987. But Prechter's record at the end of |
| the twentieth century has not been so perfect: his book "At The Crest Of |
| The Tidal Wave" (1995), calling for the end of the great bull market in |
| 1995, was nearly five years and many Dow points premature. |
| Trading with Elliott Wave means applying a principle that is true for all |
| • |
| trading in general: expectations must be realistic, and money |
| management is key to profitability over the long-term; that is, losses must |
| be kept small and profits must be allowed to accumulate. |
| One way to use Elliott Theory is to find specific parts of the theory and |
| • |
| transform them into a workable trading system in which risk can be |
| carefully controlled. |
| Approaching Elliott Wave may also mean putting less emphasis on the |
| • |
| correct wave count, and more attention on determining the count that has |
| the least penalty for being wrong. A trader can still be profitable if he or |
| she determines the primary direction of the trend, properly differentiates |
| between the primary and corrective waves, and uses tight stops and |
| realistic profit targets. |
| Computer power has helped take the subjectivity out of the Elliott Wave |
| • |
| theory. Intense statistical analysis of wave reliability has proven |
| mathematically that the theory developed more than seventy years ago by |
| R.N. Elliott is based on sound principles of market behavior. |
| Computer programs such as the Refined Elliott Trader, which is based on |
| • |
| the premise that a pattern is reliable if it is confirmed in the same time |
| period (that is, one day) over multiple date ranges - may have solved |
| some problems associated with using Elliott Wave in trading. Using the |
| computer program, however, still demands a thorough understanding of |
| Elliott Wave patterns. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 25 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
| Yourfinanceguru.com |
| – the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
| This tutorial can be found at: |
| http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
| (Page 26 of 26) |
| Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |











No comments:
Post a Comment