|
|
|
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com |
Thanks very much for downloading the printable version of this tutorial. |
As always, we welcome any feedback or suggestions. |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com |
Table of Contents |
1) Elliott Wave: Introduction |
2) Elliott Wave: Challenges Faced By An Expert |
3) Elliott Wave: The Best Of The Theory |
4) Elliott Wave: Shifting Into Trading Gear |
5) Elliott Wave: Solving The Probability Problem |
6) Elliott Wave: Conclusion |
Introduction |
There is a standard joke shared by technical analysts that if you were to put |
twelve Elliott Wave practitioners in a room, they would fail to reach an agreement |
on wave count and the direction in which a stock is headed. There is no doubt |
that the |
Elliott Wave theory |
has posed some interpretive challenges, but is such |
skepticism fair? |
Robert Prechter |
, the undisputed leading expert of Elliott Wave, has made some |
excellent forecasts using the theory, particularly in the '70s and '80s - he |
forecasted the horrific |
crash of 1987 |
. But Prechter's record at the end of |
the twentieth century has not been stellar. In fact, his book "At The Crest Of The |
Tidal Wave" (1995), which publicly called for the end of the great bull market in |
1995, was nearly five years and many |
Dow |
points premature; he was advising |
clients to exit the market even though the ascent was nowhere near its end. |
If even the leading Elliott Wave expert finds Elliott Wave theory and its |
application so challenging, what hope is there for the rest of us? The high degree |
of subjectivity involved in using the theory is one reason why it can be so |
problematic and why it is rare to find agreement among practitioners. This leads |
to uncertainty, which in trading or investing leads to inaction. This may explain |
(Page 1 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
why so many traders opt to trade without Elliott Wave or give up in frustration |
after using it for a while. But is such an attitude akin to throwing the baby out with |
the bath water? |
In this feature, we hunt down and use Elliott Wave-based programs and products |
that greatly streamline the process of taking the theory and applying it to trade. |
Think of these as applications that help bring Elliott Wave into the twenty-first |
century. |
Our goal is to familiarize readers with the new millennium version of Elliott Wave |
theory. For those who may have rejected the theory out of frustration, this tutorial |
will demonstrate how new developments in technology have transformed this |
application, which was developed more than sixty years ago. |
First, let's take a look at the history of Prechter's application of Elliott Wave and |
how it demonstrates both the successes and challenges of the theory. |
Challenges Faced By An Expert |
In late September and early October 1987, |
Robert Prechter |
saw three conditions |
that had not occurred since the top of 1976. To begin with, the price pattern of |
the wave structure in the U.S. stock market |
rally |
between Sept 20 and Oct 2 of |
1987 took the shape of a rebound in a larger decline, rather than the start of a |
new wave. It was typical of a |
bear market |
rally. |
Secondly, he observed a distinct reduction in upside momentum, and the trading |
index quickly became extremely |
overbought |
, which indicated that the rally was in |
trouble. |
Advance/decline |
ratios were the worst of the year, suggesting that |
market internals were in failure mode. |
Finally, Prechter noticed that investor psychology was shifting strongly and that |
premiums on stock |
index futures |
had soared to their highest levels in 18 months. |
In other words, traders and investors were more bullish than they had been in the |
previous year and a half. With most of the market players in long positions, who |
was left to buy? |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 2 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Figure 1 – Daily Dow Jones Industrial Average 1987 showing date (Oct 2, 1987) |
when Prechter advised clients to exit the market. |
It was enough to cause Prechter to advise his subscribers to get out on Friday, |
Oct 2, 1987 (according to the article "Black Monday Postscript," published in |
S&C |
Volume 5 Issue 11) (see Figure 1). The Dow Jones Industrial Average |
closed at 2640.99. The following Monday - and the ensuing two and a half weeks |
- saw the mighty index drop to 1738.74 in an astounding decline of more than |
34%. Oct 19 became known as |
Black Monday |
and set the record for the largest |
one-day percentage drop - a startling 23%. Clients who took Prechter's advice to |
get out missed the sickening ride down and no doubt felt deeply indebted to him. |
Robert Prechter has been studying Elliott Wave theory since the 1970s. He used |
it while working as a technical market specialist at Merrill Lynch. In 1978 he co- |
authored "Elliott Wave Principle" with A.J. Frost. He also launched |
The Elliott |
Wave Theorist |
, a newsletter devoted to the analysis of U.S. markets. In the |
1980s, Prechter became a household name in the financial community, and he |
won numerous awards for |
market timing |
, as well as the U.S. Trading |
Championship. The Financial News Network (now CNBC) dubbed him the "guru |
of the decade" in the 1980s. He is the CEO and founder of Elliott Wave |
International and has authored numerous books about Elliott Wave, including "At |
The Crest Of The Tidal Wave" (1995) |
, |
"View From The Top Of The Grand |
Supercycle" (2003) |
, |
"Conquer The Crash: You Can Survive And Prosper In A |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 3 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Deflationary Depression" (2002) |
, |
"Socionomics: The Science Of History And |
Social Prediction" (2003) |
, |
"Market Analysis For The New Millennium" (2002) and |
"Beautiful Pictures From The Gallery Of Phinance" (2003). |
Discerning Patterns |
Trader Garrett Jones, a 30-plus-year veteran in the money management |
industry, initially met Prechter in the early 1980s when both were occasional |
speakers on the same financial speaking circuit. Jones had been aware of |
market waves for years and had read the work of numerous technical analysts |
discussing price patterns. Jones noticed that things seem to happen in threes. |
The market would frequently make three advances and then have a correction. |
He also noticed that three advances would generally have a definable pattern. |
The first pattern Jones observed was a series of three waves (each of which was |
interrupted by a |
retracement |
or corrective wave) in which the first wave was |
longest. In the second pattern, wave 2 was longest, and in the third, the last |
wave was longest. It is important to note that the middle wave is never the |
shortest wave in any viable pattern. What Jones realized in listening to Prechter |
was that the price patterns he had observed on occasion were actually the basic |
impulse waves discussed in Elliott Wave theory. |
Jones credits Prechter with helping him better understand the intricate details of |
Elliott Wave theory and thus become a better trader. However, Jones still thinks |
the theory is most valuable for looking at the |
macroeconomic |
picture. |
The Elliott Challenge |
Prechter has had other notable successes in forecasting |
Dow Industrial |
moves |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 4 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
well before they occurred. In the Sept 1982 issue of |
The Elliott Wave Theorist, |
published one month after the end of a 16-year |
sideways |
trend, he correctly |
forecasted the great "lift-off" that year. It was the start of what many have called |
the big |
bull market |
, although Prechter believes this bull market really began at |
the Dow multi-year low in Dec 1974. |
But in his earlier book, "Elliott Wave Principle", co-authored with A.J. Frost in |
1978, the two underestimated the top of the next wave five 'supercycle,' |
projecting a final target top at 2860. Those reading Prechter's |
Elliott Wave |
Theorist |
newsletter in 1982 were advised that the target had been revised to |
3873-3885 and would be reached by 1987 or 1990. While in retrospect these |
forecasts fell far short of the ultimate gain, they were the highest published |
predictions of their day during a time when most people doubted the market's |
prospects. |
When the '90s rolled around, Prechter was just as radical in the other direction, |
once again opposing the general consensus. But as we mentioned earlier, his |
book "At The Crest Of The Tidal Wave", which publicly called for the end of the |
great bull market in 1995, was nearly five years and many Dow points premature. |
Prechter subsequently wrote a chapter detailing why he missed a big portion of |
the bull market. |
Garrett Jones is quick to come to Prechter's defense: |
"It doesn't matter if you use EWT or other methods of technical analysis, it is |
important to be disciplined and admit when you are wrong. No one is right 100% |
of the time and Prechter has been quick to adjust his forecasts as new |
information comes in. He is a brilliant analyst, and he remains bearish to this day |
for reasons to do with his understanding of Elliott Wave and overriding market |
and economic fundamentals. He may not be sure exactly when the market will |
crash, but he knows it's coming." |
As Prechter points out, the Dow nearly quintupled from 1974 to 1987. Who would |
have believed it would more than quintuple again by 2000? Such a move was |
unprecedented. |
Plug and Play Elliott Wave Theory - Can it be Done? |
Ralph Nelson Elliott's |
original work, "The Wave Principle", was published in 1938 |
long before the days of the computer. The fact that he progressed as far as he |
did with his observations and calculations without the use of a computer is an |
amazing feat in itself. Given the highly technical and analytical nature of |
developing Elliott Wave-based forecasts, would it not make sense to have |
computers do the difficult and tedious background work, thus freeing the trader to |
take the results and use them with far greater ease? Many traders think so, and |
while Prechter maintains the conviction that it will always take a certain amount |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 5 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
of human intervention to finalize an Elliott Wave forecast, his company is |
currently working on a computer application that will greatly streamline the |
process for clients. They are not alone. |
In our next installment of this series, we'll examine an approach that takes |
specific parts of Elliott's principle and uses it for short-term |
intraday |
trading and |
longer-term end-of-day trades to greatly simplify trading decisions. It is a great |
way to discuss Elliott Wave theory and how it works in real-time trades. |
The Best Of The Theory |
For those not familiar with |
Elliott Wave theory |
its most basic tenet is that market |
movements are based on crowd behavior, which is seen as predictable given |
similar situations. Creator R.N. Elliott showed that these movements occur in a |
series of impulse and corrective waves. |
For example, a bearish impulse swing consists of three waves down and two |
waves up (see Figure 1). Major |
impulse waves |
down (1, 3 and 5) can be further |
broken down into smaller five-part impulse down waves and corrective up waves, |
depending on the time frame over which the waves are observed. Bullish waves |
move in the opposite direction. |
But this is where it starts to get more complicated. These smaller waves can be |
further broken down into more waves, which are interrelated by |
Fibonacci |
numbers |
(1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, etc.), and on it goes. Wave analysis runs the |
gamut from supercycles lasting hundreds of years to sub-minuets that may last |
only a few minutes on an |
intraday |
chart. |
One of the hardest things about trading Elliott Wave is its degree of complexity. |
To make it even more challenging, there are alternates to every potential move, |
which basically tells the trader that if this move doesn't go up, it will go down, but |
he or she will know that only after the fact! The rule of alternation also means that |
the corrective waves 2 and 4 will alternate. If a wave 2 down is a simple wave, |
then wave 4 will probably be complex, but not necessarily. Then there are X |
waves. These are waves that connect complex corrections. |
It is easy to see why many novices shy away from using Elliott Wave and why |
many traders who have invested thousands of hours into it (and lost dollars trying |
to develop working trading strategies) finally abandon it altogether. |
Starting with the End in Mind |
To begin with, the trader must have realistic expectations. Most new traders |
spend the majority of their time looking for a system that has an unrealistically |
high win/loss ratio. Those still seeking a system that consistently produces more |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 6 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
than 50% winners in the long term haven't learned that surviving the market |
means knowing how to deal with losses. Suc h traders are looking for the Holy |
Grail, and it doesn't exist. |
It's worth remembering what well-known author and professional trader Perry |
Kaufman had to say after years of exhaustive testing of various trend-following |
systems, some of which were discussed in his book "Trading Systems And |
Methods" (1998): "You can expect six or seven out of 10 trend trades to be |
losses, some small some a little larger." |
And yet, Kaufman says that trend-following systems are some of the best trading |
systems around. In other words, trend-following systems have more losers than |
winners, but professional traders who use them make money consistently. |
Renowned technical analyst John Murphy echoes this sentiment when he states |
that veteran professional traders experience winning trades 40% of the time. |
Granted, it is possible to outperform this record over short-term periods, but |
expecting any system to do much better over the long haul is unrealistic. |
This means that for any system to be profitable long-term, money management is |
key. If a trading system cannot be profitable with more losses than winners, find |
another system or spend more time on money management. In short, losses |
must be kept small and profits must be allowed to accumulate. Unfortunately, the |
majority of traders do just the opposite and end up going out of business. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 7 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Figure 1 – Chart of Dow Industrial Average ($INDU) five-minute intraday chart |
showing a short-term bear Elliott five-wave impulse pattern. On a one-minute |
chart, a further breakdown of smaller impulse and corrective waves could be |
observed. The colored bands are key areas of support, which are potential areas |
of reversal. |
Applying this idea to trading Elliott, Figure 1 shows a five-minute chart of the Dow |
Industrial e-mini futures with a five-part impulse wave. Colored bands show the |
points of |
support |
(or |
resistance |
in an uptrend) and are where the trader looks to |
place a trade or adjust stops on current positions. |
Programming Elliott to Trade |
In the 500+ page manual for MTPredicto |
r |
, author and creator of the program |
Steve Griffiths |
makes an interesting observation. He says there are basically |
three types of people when it comes to Elliott Wave. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 8 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
1) Those who are new to the principle and still completely amazed at what it |
promises. |
2) Those who are experienced but frustrated by their lack of |
success/consistency. |
3) Those who have completely given up (sometimes after years of trying to make |
it work) and are frustrated by the whole experience. |
To avoid falling into the third category, the modern trader needs to ask how Elliott |
Wave theory can be used to make money in today's markets. Is there a way of |
automating the analytical process using the complete theory, or is it possible to |
strip it down and isolate specific aspects of the principle to pick money-making |
trades? Becoming an expert but finding it impossible to make money is a waste |
of time. |
As an Elliot Wave expert and a private trader with more than 17 years of |
experience, Griffiths asked himself the same questions. After spending years |
trying to make money on a consistent basis using alternate methods, he went |
back to Elliott Wave basics. He started with the premise that if Elliott Wave was |
to work in a program, he had to find setups that limited risk to a minimum that |
allowed profits to run. These setups had to be specific, identifiable and |
consistently profitable. If overall losses are greater than profits, what good are |
the longer-term forecasts for which Elliott Wave analysis is famous? |
According to the theory, the strongest moves in a trend, whether up or down, are |
the impulse waves 1, 3 and 5. Of the three impulsive waves, the largest and most |
profitable is generally wave 3. Therefore, the ideal place to enter a trade is at the |
beginning of wave 3, which is the end of a corrective wave 2. Could the program |
be designed to hone in on these ABC corrective patterns (see Figure 2) that |
normally unfold in a wave 2 and provide the trader with a high-probability point of |
entry? Here is what Griffiths said in an Oct 2004 interview to discuss how the |
program came into being: |
"In computer testing, we found that it was possible to enter with a minimum risk |
after an ABC had recently unfolded and the best were those that made up wave |
2. By entering long trades very near significant support levels (and short traders |
near significant resistance levels), losses would be kept small if the trade turned |
out to be a loser. Winners had the potential to be very profitable indeed when the |
trader caught a wave 3 but the system had to be designed in such a way that the |
large gains were a bonus, not essential to the profitability of the system." |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 9 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Figure 2 – End-of-day chart of iShares Japan on quick breakout from an ABC |
corrective pattern buy signal. |
This became Griffiths' goal: to design a computer program for his personal use |
that could search for ABC patterns that made up a wave 2 ending at or near |
significant support or resistance areas with a minimum risk/reward of 2:1. He |
could then choose only those that met specific risk/reward ratios according to his |
written trading plan. A more aggressive approach would be to take every trade |
generated by the program. A more conservative style allowed him to choose |
trades with a minimum risk/reward of 2.5 or 3:1. |
After the first version of the program was completed four years ago, Griffiths |
realized that the application he had developed had commercial potential since |
there had to be others like him who were frustrated with the lack of success using |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 10 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Elliott but knew that it was based on sound technical and crowd behavior |
principles. |
Figure 3 – An intraday trade on the Dow e-minis futures (YM) showing a very |
profitable trade. |
Figure 3 shows the program in action. It is a chart of the five-minute Dow (YM) e- |
mini futures trade with the proprietary colored bands of significant |
support/resistance. These are generated with the use of automatic Fibonacci |
price clusters of varying degree and from multiple |
pivots |
that tell the trader where |
the highest probability of pauses and reversals should occur. As you can see, the |
trade was very profitable having moved well past the ‘two to three times' profit |
area (blue band) to end the day at a new multi-period low resulting in a profit of |
approximately 12 times the initial risk (ignoring |
slippage |
and commission) at the |
lower projected profit target. While this is not a typical trade, it demonstrates what |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 11 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
can happen when the trader catches a strong wave-3 move. |
For the sake of those unfamiliar with the program, MTPredicto |
r |
includes a |
record |
of all trades the program has called (with a minimum risk/reward ratio of 2:1) |
since July 26, 2004. Since real money was not used and commissions and |
slippage not included, the trade results are hypothetical. It is not unusual to see |
more losses than wins, but what is important is the comparison of the number of |
points or dollars that were won to those that were lost. This is the acid test of |
whether a money management system is working. |
For those who are interested, a software review of the program, " |
Software |
Review: MTPredictor Real-Time 4.0 |
", was published in the Sept 2004 issue |
of |
The Technical Analyst. |
The Key to Success |
Here is what fund trader John McClure of |
Equitrend |
said when asked about |
profitability in an Oct 2004 interview: |
"Profitability cannot be discussed without mentioning the other side of the |
equation: risk. The trap that many investors and traders fall into is to focus on the |
first part of the equation while not paying attention to the second. The |
professional money manager's goal is to improve profits by managing risk. Risk |
should be the most important part of the equation, not the other way around." |
In other words, find a system that manages risk first and the profits will usually |
take care of themselves. |
To borrow an old saying, there are many ways "to skin a cat" when trading. No |
single trading system will attract or work for everyone. This is especially true for |
Elliott Wave. |
Finding specific parts of Elliott theory and transforming them into a workable |
trading system in which risk can be carefully controlled is one way to use the |
theory. And MTPredicto |
r |
shows that you don't have to use the complete Elliott |
Wave theory to trade successfully. By taking small parts of the theory, using a |
computer and the right program, traders can now learn to trade Elliott without |
having to become experts in the theory itself. This is a good example of how one |
company has taken Elliott's brainchild and adapted it to work in the twenty-first |
century. |
Shifting Into Trading Gear |
In the preceding section in this series, we look at how one company isolated |
parts of Elliott Wave patterns and helped the trader identify them in both end-of- |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 12 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
day and real-time trading situations. In this section, we talk to an experienced |
trade systems designer who has researched the challenge of implementing Elliott |
Wave theory by computer since the mid-1990s. |
The Designer |
Murray Ruggiero |
is no stranger to trading system users. He is the author of a |
number of books on the topic - including "Cybernetic Trading Strategies: |
Developing A Profitable Trading Strategy With State-Of-The-Art Technologies" |
(1997) and "Traders' Secrets Psychological & Technical Analysis: Real People |
Becoming Successful Traders" (1999), the |
Inside Advantage |
newsletter, as well |
as more than 70 articles in various trading public ations. His work is referenced in |
books by such prominent authors as Larry Williams, John Murphy and Perry |
Kaufman. |
In his book "Trading Systems And Methods" (1998), trading system specialist |
Perry Kaufman presents four of Ruggiero's suggestions for trading Elliott by |
machine: |
1) Enter wave 3 in the direction of the trend. |
2) Stay out of market during wave 4. |
3) Enter wave 5. |
4) Take countertrend ABC at top of wave 5. |
Kaufman also says: "When a wave appears in two time frames such as both daily |
and weekly charts, the likelihood of the success of this formation increases." |
Without some sort of confirmation, the risk of being on the wrong side of the |
trade increases. |
Accuracy is Not Key? |
The problem with trading Elliott concepts by computer, Ruggiero believ es, is that |
the designer must reduce the highly subjective aspect of the theory into |
quantifiable, specific components. The goal is to find those areas of the theory |
that work best and then tell the computer how to find them for you. |
To Ruggiero, the key is not in trying to "teach" the machine to count Elliott Waves |
accurately because, like Robert Prechter, Ruggiero still believes that it takes a |
degree of human intervention to apply the highly complex aspects of Elliott Wave |
interpretation. This need for human involvement is due to the fact that Elliott |
Wave has been traditionally used in longer-term forecasting. |
But traders are more interested in much shorter time frames, and it makes sense |
that a system that is to trade intraday has a different focus than a system looking |
for a target that is weeks, months or years away. |
"There is a difference between today's count and the true count," Ruggiero says. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 13 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
"The key to trading Elliott lies in not getting hung up on the correct wave count, |
but rather in determining the count that has the least penalty for being wrong." |
Finding the correct count requires time. There are nine different wave patterns or |
degrees of trend in Elliott Wave ranging from the grand supercycle lasting |
hundreds of years to the sub-minuet degree covering a few hours. Elliott |
practitioners can spend days arguing over correct wave count but, in many |
cases, the number will not be confirmed until after the fact. |
However, the trader is not interested in whether the chosen |
index |
or |
future |
is the |
first or third wave but rather what his or her risk of being wrong is versus the |
potential reward. A trader is really looking for an entry price that is close to |
support, which, if broken, will nullify the pattern and result in a small loss but, if |
correct, will return three to five times the amount risked. |
For example, if, in the complete Elliott Wave below, the trader mistook the bottom |
of wave 2 to be the bottom of wave 4 and entered a long trade, he or she would |
catch wave 3 instead of wave 5 and still make a good profit because both waves |
3 and 5 are generally powerful up moves. In certain cases, a wave 3 is the |
longest wave in the pattern. |
Now let's say the same trader mistook wave B for wave 1, and then entered a |
long trade at the next pause bec ause he or she thought it was a new wave 3; this |
pause would've actually been a continuation of wave C, making the trade a |
painful experience, especially if wave C was incomplete. |
In Figure 1 below, we see an example of a wave pattern that was identified by |
the computer as an ABC wave but was actually part of a much larger corrective |
wave. It worked out well for the trader, who, instead of earning the expected |
profit of two- to three-times risk (5.5 points), made more than six times that |
amount. |
The point is that it doesn't really matter if the trader gets the wave count wrong. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 14 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
As long as he or she determines the primary direction of the trend, properly |
differentiates between the primary and corrective waves and uses tight stops and |
realistic profit targets, trades can still be very profitable. |
Figure 1 – Five-minute chart of the Dow Industrial Average showing a profitable |
trade and the Elliott Wave Oscillator in the lower window. |
Elliott Wave Oscillator |
What can an Elliott Wave computer trader use to gain greater insight into where |
he or she is in a wave? Create an Elliott Wave |
oscillator |
(EWO), according to |
Perry Kaufman. The EWO is simply the difference between a five-period and 35- |
period |
simple moving average |
, which in Figure 1 is shown as red and blue |
moving average lines. |
In |
Metastock |
, for example, the formula for the EWO is simple. To get the display |
shown in Figure 1, plot the formula below as a histogram: |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 15 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
EWO = Mov(Close, 5) – Mov(Close, 35). |
Note the magenta lines in the main chart and those in the lower EWO window |
slanting in the opposite direction. This shows clear divergence between price and |
the Elliott Wave oscillator - a sign that a change in direction is imminent. |
Kaufman says that a new upward trend is identified when the EWO makes a |
higher high than the previous EWO high. For example, in an uptrend, a wave-3 |
EWO high would be greater than a wave-1 high. |
As we see in figure 1, the EWO, like any good oscillator, can also be used as a |
warning of |
divergence |
and the change in direction. After watching the EWO for a |
while, you will begin to see the pattern. In an uptrend, the EWO will put in a |
series of higher highs after which it will drop below zero, which will be the ABC |
corrective pattern. A new series is then about to begin. |
Trades confirmed by an oscillator are lower risk than those without confirmation. |
When the oscillator begins to put in a series of lower highs while price puts in |
higher highs, get ready for a trend change. |
In Summary |
Rather than try to "train" the computer to perform the complex and subjective |
task of accurately identifying all aspects of the Elliott Wave, it is far more feasible |
to isolate patterns that are close to each other and places where the penalty for |
being wrong is minimized. |
This means identifying the primary trend, taking trades in this direction and |
setting tight stops in case you have made an error in your analysis. It won't |
matter that much if you mistakenly identify one part of the wave for another as |
long as they are similar parts in the wave cycle. |
To help confirm the proper entry and exit points, the Elliott Wave oscillator can be |
used to choose higher highs and higher lows in an uptrend, or lower highs and |
lower lows in a downtrend. Divergence between the oscillator and price is also a |
very useful tool for trade confirmation. Furthermore, wherever possible, |
confirmation in different time periods - for example, a five- and 15-minute chart |
for short-term traders, or a daily and weekly chart for longer-term traders - further |
increases the chances of a profitable outcome. |
With a basic understanding of the theory and a bit of practice, it won't be long |
before you are using what you have learned to enhance your trading acumen. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 16 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Solving the Probability Problem |
"Pride of opinion has been responsible |
for the downfall of more men on Wall |
Street than any other factor." |
Charles Dow |
Without a doubt, the greatest drawback of using Elliott Wave theory (EWT), and |
the reason most traders avoid it, is its high degree of subjectivity. Even the most |
experienced Elliott experts can have trouble agreeing on wave counts and |
forecasts on the same issue, index or |
commodity |
. Where there is subjectivity, |
there is uncertainty. Overcoming this uncertainty requires the guidance of solid |
probabilities determined by statistical analysis. Let's take a look at a development |
that, through computer power, has helped take the subjectivity out of the Elliott |
Wave theory. |
Adverse Effects of Opinions |
As all successful traders have learned, solid rules are essential to long-term |
success. The possible variations in deriving an Elliott Wave count while either |
strictly or strongly adhering to the original rules make it hard to know which count |
is best. Ultimately, the analyst chooses the count with which he or she feels most |
comfortable, but that is often based on little more than an educated guess or past |
experience. As such, the analysts may be prone to get "married" to the opinion, |
even when logic might dictate otherwise. |
Opinions never hurt when it comes to the markets until there is money at stake. If |
the market goes against the trader, unquestioning loyalty to an opinion can be |
very costly. Fear of being wrong, combined with pride of opinion, is a deadly |
handicap in the trading business; emotional gremlins are more responsible for |
traders' failings than any other single factor. |
In his book, |
" |
Trading In The Zone" (2000), trader Mark Douglas helps traders |
break the emotional habit. All great traders who have sustained success have |
learned to think in probabilities, realizing that trading is nothing more than a |
numbers game. Successful traders have made it a habit to make decisions only if |
they know the |
risk/reward ratio |
and if they have |
backtested |
and recorded the |
past success of their system. Emotions don't control these decisions. |
Probabilities do. |
Until the late twentieth century, however, Elliott traders did not have the luxury of |
knowing the precise probabilities of success or failure of a forecast. Because of |
the complexities of Elliott Wave, there was no way of knowing what to expect |
with any degree of mathematical confidence from even a single Elliott Wave |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 17 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
pattern, let alone a complicated one spanning a number of years. No public |
databases providing that information were available. |
Putting Elliott to the Test |
In 1994, a small team from Perth led by Rich Swannell began designing Elliott |
Wave computer programs for traders. Swannell was a programmer first and |
trader second. Very few in the world of trading are good at both. |
During the early years, the team consulted with Elliott veterans, conducted |
intense research, and developed what Swannell claims was the world's first |
comprehensive software program designed to analyze price data using the rules |
and guidelines of Elliott's theory. The problem with the software was that it was |
based on observations and not an exhaustive statistical analysis of wave |
reliability. And, while results from the software were respectable, without |
probabilities the trader was still trading blind. How could a way be found to |
overcome this weakness? |
The team came up with a novel solution. Swannell developed a screen saver in |
2001 that would work in the background on the computers of more than three |
thousand volunteers. While not being used by their owners, these machines |
would be scanning a universe of stocks, commodities and indexes to search for |
and analyze Elliott Wave patterns. The goal was to determine once and for all |
which patterns worked, which did not and even whether the Elliott Wave theory |
itself had sufficient merit to trade it with confidence. It was all based on |
mathematical probabilities. |
After eighteen months and hundreds of thousands of hours of computer time, the |
team had enough data to start analyzing it. For those interested in more details, |
Swannell wrote a book about the experience, "Elite Trader's Secrets: Market |
Forecasting With The New Elliot Wave System" (2003); it includes a good |
analysis of Elliott patterns. Here is a summary of what they found: |
1. Not only did the Elliott Wave theory prove to be statistically sound, the |
research was able to generate the probabilities of a forecast being correct. |
In other words, the trader could now know the chances of a wave pattern |
and the resulting forecast with a low margin of error (statistical |
significance). |
2. The most common Elliott Wave patterns were often significantly different |
in both shape and frequency than the previous conceptions of them. Some |
patterns that were previously believed to be reliable did not work often |
enough to be used with any degree of confidence. |
3. The team confirmed Murray Ruggiero's finding that a correct wave count is |
not the most important factor in trading. Even with the help of a good |
program, all Elliott forecasts are, at best, an educated guess: a trader can |
never be certain because there is always a larger pattern that cannot be |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 18 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
included in the analysis unless he or she goes back to the beginning of |
time. Swannell's team found that since many alternate counts result in |
similar forecasts, this problem of possible inaccuracy is not as critical as |
many previously thought. As long as a count is arrived at logically, |
adheres to the rules and is confirmed over various time periods, it doesn't |
matter what the larger degree (next largest wave pattern) is. In Swannell's |
findings, the most probable scenarios gave exactly or at least very similar |
forecasted results. This finding is crucial to a trader's success and means |
that, as Ruggiero says, the count is of less importance than the penalty for |
being wrong, which is the loss on the trade. |
4. By performing forecasts in various time frames, the team separated the |
issues that worked from those that didn't. Forecasts for those that |
exhibited no consensus over various time periods wer e deemed unreliable |
(see our example below for a more detailed explanation). The probability |
for failure in most cases was greater than the probability for success, so |
why take the chance? |
Of the thousands of equities, indexes and commodities tested, Swannell's team |
found that in about 65% of the cases, Elliott Wave theory proved too unreliable to |
be used to trade with any degree of confidence. In other words, using the theory |
to trade the instruments included in this 65% would prove a losing proposition. It |
means that traders should limit their focus to the 35% that proved to be viable |
trading candidates. |
But why did only about one-third of the candidates work using Elliott? It has to do |
with the basis of the Elliott principle, which quantifies market crowd behavior. |
Elliott Wave theory works best in equities that (1) have lots of volume ( |
liquidity |
) |
and (2) move according to key forces of fear and greed on the part of many |
participants. When a security is not prone to this crowd behavior and is controlled |
instead by a few strong hands, Elliott patterns begin to break down. Issues |
traded by a few are more subject to manipulation and control and, therefore, are |
more difficult to forecast. |
Elliott warned us that his theory worked best on indexes and very liquid |
securities, so Swannell's finding was not all that surprising. But now the notion |
was proven and quantified and a list of trading candidates was identified. In the |
process, a large amount of subjectivity and uncertainty was removed. All this |
information was now stored and available in a large database for immediate |
computer reference. |
Coding and Applying the Lessons Learned |
Through ongoing research and data from the screen saver program, Swannell's |
team further discovered that certain techniques, when consistently applied, |
generated impressive forecasting results. A new proprietary indicator based in |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 19 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
part on the Elliott Wave oscillator also greatly assisted the trader in recognizing |
and confirming key reversal points. |
The new discoveries were in part based on a prime tenet of |
technical analysis |
that if a pattern or method of analysis works in one time frame, it should also |
work in others. Moreover, the more time frames in which patterns confirm each |
other, the higher the probability that a forecast will be correct. For example, if a |
pattern within daily data agrees with one found in weekly data, the trader can |
have greater confidence in the pattern. |
Swannell's team also found that a pattern confirmed in the same time period (that |
is, one day) over multiple date ranges was much more reliable. For example, |
using a starting point of the Oct 1987 low, let's say that we find an impulse wave |
consisting of three up-waves and two down- (corrective) waves in an uptrend. If |
this impulse wave agrees with patterns we find using a low from 1998, a low from |
2002 and one from 2003, the reliability of a forecast made using these four time |
periods is substantially higher than one made in only one or two time frames. |
This confirmation of patterns has become the basic premise of forecasting using |
the program called the Refined Elliott Trader. |
Taking the process one step further, the software Swannell's team developed |
rated each pattern, and those exhibiting a rating of 80 or more were reliable |
enough to use in a forecast. Those with scores above 100 were most reliable. |
Let's look at an example analyzing the |
S&P 500 Index |
using end-of-day data. |
The following charts show how the program is used to produce market forecasts. |
In this example, head trader Mark Lindsay takes us through the analysis process |
of locating confirmation Elliott Waves over four different time periods. We are |
looking for parts of the same wave patterns. The more closely they confirm each |
other, the more confidence we can have in the forecast. . |
The Refined Elliott Trader looks for statistically significant matches and rates |
each pattern it identifies. Note on the left-hand side of each chart the list of |
numbers showing the rating of each pattern. We are looking for ratings (at the top |
of the list) of 80 or better. A rating of 100 is excellent and means that the pattern |
on the screen shows a strong correlation with similar patterns found in the |
database. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 20 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Figure 1 – Long-term chart of the SPX from 1990 to 2004 showing large impulse |
wave and forecasted price using RET. |
In Figure 1 we start with a chart going back 15 years from 2004. It shows the |
longest-term chart with an impulse wave starting in late 1990. Wave 1 peaks in |
mid-2000, and wave 2 bottoms in Oct 2002. Wave 2 is a corrective ABC pattern. |
According to this chart in 2003-2004 and going into 2005, we were in a wave 3. |
The dark red rectangular pattern, which has a target area between 2000 and |
3500 (indicated by dark-red vertical line) is the longer-term forecast. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 21 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Figure 2 – Second shorter-term chart of SPX focusing in on the same impuls e |
pattern shown in figure 1. |
Next we isolate the wave 2 from Mar 2000 to Oct 2002 (figure 2) to see the |
pattern in more detail. Remember, we are looking for pattern confirmation in each |
step of the process. As we take a closer look at each pattern, we see each wave |
in greater detail. |
In Figure 2, we take a closer look at the period from late 2000 to late 2003 and |
isolate impulse wave 3. Impulse waves occur in waves of five while corrective |
waves like the one we see if figure 1 between 2000 and 2002 occur in waves of |
three. Also note that forecasts generated in each chart confirm one another. This |
is important if the trader is to have a high degree of confidence in the ultimate |
forecast. |
In figure 3, we focus in closer, looking at the period from Feb 2003 and Dec 2004 |
showing impulse wave 3 in greater detail. It shows the first part of wave 3 |
followed by a ‘double 3' (sideways corrective wave) with the start of a smaller |
wave 3 (at the buy arrow). |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 22 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Figure 3 – Third shorter-term chart of SPX gives a closer look at the impulse |
pattern showing a similar forecast to the above charts. |
The final screen (Figure 4) shows the latest wave 3 from Aug 2004 to Dec 2004. |
The smaller parts of this wave consist of even smaller impulse waves 1, 2, 3, 4, |
and what looks to be the start of an impulsive wave 5 with an immediate price |
target from Dec 3 between 1220 and 1290. |
This program also produces expected time ranges for each target (not shown in |
these figures). |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 23 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
|
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
Figure 4 – Smallest time frame chart of the SPX showing end of impulse wave, |
forecasted price and the proprietary Refined Elliott Oscillator (lower window) |
used to help traders pick potential entry and exit points. |
It is important that the waves found by the program in each of the four charts |
confirm one other. If the overall pattern in the first chart is not found in the |
following three charts in a lesser degree, something is wrong and it's time to go |
back to the drawing board. If after performing a detailed search, the patterns |
don't agree, it's better to discard the prospect of trading the security than risk a |
bad trade. |
Challenges and Solutions |
The program developed by the Australian team may have solved a number of the |
challenges that existed, but it is not for those looking for an effortless trading |
system. |
As a word of warning, the Refined Elliott Trader demands a thorough |
understanding and recognition of Elliott Wave patterns. A minimum of 50 hours is |
required to learn the 60 modules in the first level Elliottician course and then pass |
the four wave-recognition speed tests. Those with a phobia for learning or with |
little interest in probing the nuances of Elliott Wave theory are advised to look |
elsewhere. |
But in the final analysis, all Elliott traders should take heart in the findings of this |
research even if they have no interest in using a computer program. It proves |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 24 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
mathematically that the theory developed more than seventy years ago by R.N. |
Elliott is based on sound principles of market behavior. Actions taken by |
investors in the past do have chart pattern ramifications in the present, |
regardless of the reasons for these actions. The scope and duration of these |
reactions can be used to trade or invest longer term with greater confidence. |
Conclusion |
Here are some principles about Elliott Wave we discovered in this tutorial: |
The |
Elliott Wave theory |
requires a high degree of subjectivity, which is one |
• |
reason why using the theory can be so problematic - finding agreement |
among Elliott Wave practitioners can be rare. |
The most basic tenet of Elliott Wave theory is that market movements are |
• |
based on crowd behavior, which can be predicted. Traders, however, may |
often discern a market move only after it has occurred. |
Robert Prechter |
, leading expert of Elliott Wave, has made some accurate |
• |
forecasts using the theory, particularly in the '70s and '80s. Specifically, he |
forecasted the crash of 1987. But Prechter's record at the end of |
the twentieth century has not been so perfect: his book "At The Crest Of |
The Tidal Wave" (1995), calling for the end of the great bull market in |
1995, was nearly five years and many Dow points premature. |
Trading with Elliott Wave means applying a principle that is true for all |
• |
trading in general: expectations must be realistic, and money |
management is key to profitability over the long-term; that is, losses must |
be kept small and profits must be allowed to accumulate. |
One way to use Elliott Theory is to find specific parts of the theory and |
• |
transform them into a workable trading system in which risk can be |
carefully controlled. |
Approaching Elliott Wave may also mean putting less emphasis on the |
• |
correct wave count, and more attention on determining the count that has |
the least penalty for being wrong. A trader can still be profitable if he or |
she determines the primary direction of the trend, properly differentiates |
between the primary and corrective waves, and uses tight stops and |
realistic profit targets. |
Computer power has helped take the subjectivity out of the Elliott Wave |
• |
theory. Intense statistical analysis of wave reliability has proven |
mathematically that the theory developed more than seventy years ago by |
R.N. Elliott is based on sound principles of market behavior. |
Computer programs such as the Refined Elliott Trader, which is based on |
• |
the premise that a pattern is reliable if it is confirmed in the same time |
period (that is, one day) over multiple date ranges - may have solved |
some problems associated with using Elliott Wave in trading. Using the |
computer program, however, still demands a thorough understanding of |
Elliott Wave patterns. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 25 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
Yourfinanceguru.com |
– the resource for investing and personal finance education. |
This tutorial can be found at: |
http://www.yourfinanceguru.com/university/advancedwave/ |
(Page 26 of 26) |
Copyright © 2006, Yourfinanceguru.com - All rights reserved. |
No comments:
Post a Comment